Classical empires of SEA critique + essay Research Paper

Classical empires of sea critique + essay - Research Paper ExampleEurocentric in this mise en scene implies a term having its origin from Western Europe, but with no historical significance to the historical context of SEA people.According to Aung-Thwin,2 when historians refer to the classical purpose in Southeast Asia, they are usually referring to the period between the ninth and fourteenth centuries AD. In other give voices, the use of the term classical refers to civilization of SEA ancient kingdoms. The term refers to specific dynamics in the past considered critical in shaping the current dynamics in SEA countries. Moreover, as Aung-Twin argues, the word classical in SEA historical context was only recently used. Its use gained root in lectures and seminars during the 1960s and 1970s by western explanation scholars.3 Importantly, the term classical was first used when a group of western scholars of SEA studies met in 1977 to discuss indigenous conceptual systems among the Indic states.4 After some het discussions among the scholars in the conference, the term Indic was deliberately replaced by the term classical, and all the following scholastic work in SEA studies started bearing the term classical instead. Essentially, the civilise of the scholars was to separate the SEA historical context into distinct and systematic periods that successfully built on one another, similar to the European pre-medieval to post medieval periods. Therefore, decide from these dynamics, the term classical is Eurocentric and does not fork out any relevancy or meaning to the SEA people regarding their history. In addition, the current breed of scholars have refrained from writing anything about the classical SEA as people are more and more becoming aware of Eurocentrism, which is portrayed as a diagonal interpretation of history. The fact that earlier scholars chose to dwell on classicalness of SEA may be because they were Western educated, different from the current